SmallHD Cine 5 Review

The Cine 5 was launched at IBC 2022 and it is the first monitor to ship in SmallHD's new Smart 5 Series 5-inch Touchscreen Monitors, which feature the recently released PageOS 5 operating system.

The Smart 5 Monitor Series comprises the Ultra 5, Cine 5, and Indie 5 touchscreen displays. There are also two additional wireless versions of the Ultra 5 (TX/RX). The Smart 5 series isn't being targeted at the same user who would buy a SmallHD Action 5 Touchscreen 5″ On-Camera Monitor. That monitor was an entry-level product for a completely different audience. The Smart 5 Monitor Series is being squarely targeted at working professionals in the film and TV industry.

The Smart 5 series was designed in response to the significant demand for smaller touchscreen monitors with the same quality and functionality as SmallHD's Smart 7 and Ultrabright Series. What is nice with the Smart 5 series is that users will have access to SmallHD's camera-control licenses for ARRI, RED, and Sony VENICE.

The Ultra, Cine, and Indie in the Smart 5 Series represent three tiers of brightness, I/O capability, and physical interface options to match a wide range of on-set workflows. For example, if someone wants the top-of-the-line 3000nit powerhouse with physical buttons and an ethernet port, you can choose the Ultra 5. However, if you don't have the budget or need for an Ultra 5 but you still want to be able to control your RED KOMODO with a daylight-viewable touchscreen, then the Indie 5 or Cine 5 would be a better option.

The whole concept behind the Cine 5″ is to provide users with a professional, solidly made, portable, lightweight, daylight-viewable solution.

The Cine 5″ doesn't come with any accessories, all you get is the monitor. It would have been nice to have seen SmallHD include some accessories with the monitor, as most other 5-7″ monitors on the market tend to come with accessories as standard.

The monitor features a 1920 x 1080 LCD touchscreen with a claimed brightness of 2000 cd/m². It covers 100% DCI-P3 and it has a contrast ratio of 1000:1.

The screen is listed as 10-Bit, but it isn't a true 10-bit display, instead, it features the commonly used 10-bit (8+2). Some potential buyers may find this a little disappointing given the high cost of the monitor. However, what you should clearly know is that no panels with true 10-bit color exist in this size, everyone just uses dithering to achieve the 10-bit target. 10-bit (8+2) is pretty much imperceptible to 99% of people

A lot of companies list their monitors as 10-bit even though they are really using a 10-bit (8+2 FRC) panel. FRC stands for Frame Rate Control Technology and an 8+2 FRC panel is basically a way of trying to approximate the color reproduction of a true 10-bit panel. A true 10-bit monitor can display 1024 shades of color, whereas a 10-bit (8+2 FRC) panel can only truly display 256 shades. So what a 10-bit (8+2 FRC) panel does is artificially create in-between shades of color by quickly shifting the pixels to go between certain shades of colors.

For example, you would show the main shade of one color for 75% of the time and then another one for 25% of the time. This creates an illusion for the viewer that they are actually seeing more colors than what can actually be displayed.

8+2 FRC can be very hard to distinguish from an actual 10-bit panel. As I already mentioned, most people couldn't tell the difference between an 8+2 or a true 10-bit display.

The monitor has 442 ppi (pixels per square inch) which is a decent amount for a 5″ sized display. If you want to put that ppi figure into perspective, the ATOMOS Shinobi has 427 ppi, the ATOMOS Ninja V/V+ has 423 ppi, and SmallHD's own 503 UltraBright has 443 ppi.

Appearance-wise the Cine 5 is quite a lot thicker than other competing monitors in this space. The black finish and understated design again point to the philosophy of keeping things clean and simple. Professional monitoring solutions need to be well-made and stand up to the rigors of field use.

The external housing of the Cine 5 is made out of milled aluminum. The overall build quality is excellent, especially if you compare it to most other competing monitors in this space. Everything has been well thought out and it certainly looks like it was designed to stand up to almost any conditions.

You can tell that SmallHD paid close attention to the small details and they have thought about how professional users’ needs. It is so rare to see properly recessed SDI ports. So many monitors have totally exposed SDI ports that stick out from the body. The first thing you are likely to break apart from the screen if you drop a monitor is the SDI ports, especially if they are sticking out of the side or back of the casing.

Protecting the SDI ports is a smart move by SmallHD because if you break the SDI port, your monitor can become an expensive doorstop.

Does it get hot? The Cine 5 will get warm if you leave it on for a significant period of time, but it doesn't get as hot as the Cine 7.

The Cine 5 has three 1/4-20″ mounting points on the bottom of it and all of these mounting points feature locating pin holes. SmallHD has also paid attention to the small details here and they show you which hole you should use if you want the monitor centered.

I also like how SmallHD has placed multiple mounting points on the top, and both sides of the Cine 5. Again, all of these have locating pin holes as well.

Most competing 5″ monitors only tend to have one or two mounting points. Again the attention to detail is what sets this monitor apart from other competing products. Cinematographers want mounting flexibility with on-camera monitors, and giving them as many options as possible is a smart move.

I independently weighed the Cine 5 at 14.99 oz / 425g. This does make it heavier than most other 5″ monitors on the market. As a comparison, the ATOMOS Shinobi weighs 6.91 oz / 196 g, and SmallHD's own 503 UltraBright weighs 15.2 oz / 430.9 g

I found that the weight wasn't a big issue for me, but then again, I was using the Cine 5 with a fairly large digital cinema camera. On smaller-sized digital cinema cameras, the weight will certainly be more noticeable, especially if you are powering the monitor via batteries.

Like most monitors these days, the Cine 5 features a touchscreen so you quickly navigate and make changes without having to press any buttons.

The biggest caveat with touchscreen devices is that you end up getting fingerprints and smudges all over the screen. It is always a good idea to keep a cleaning cloth in your pocket.

The Cine 5 is a touchscreen monitor, however, it can also be controlled via a button and a joystick.

If you are familiar with SmallHD monitors that don't have touchscreen capabilities you will know that the main operation is done via a small joystick-style button. This is nice and tactile and fairly easy to use. There is also a back button, an input selection button that lets you quickly toggle through which input you want to use.

While using the physical controls is still reasonably quick to do, most people will prefer to use the touchscreen functionality. I like that SmallHD gives you two control solutions with the Cine 5, because having touchscreen control is not always ideal, especially if you are working in cold climates.

the monitor also has a power on/off button and a lock button. the lock button is handy so you can't accidentally bring up menus or make changes when it is in the On position.

The main menu Monitor Settings page allows for a lot of customization. You make changes to the inputs and outputs, the level of pixel zoom, the backlight, save and recall profiles, change the date & time, calibrate the display, and much more.

What sets SmallHD displays apart from most other options on the market is the ability to totally customize just about every element of your display.

I personally liked the tongue-in-cheek humor shown on the Interlace menu.

In my opinion, SmallHD monitors have the easiest OS system to use and operate. There is so much more to a monitor than just image quality, and a good operating system is what often sets monitors apart. Usability and operability sometimes get overlooked by people looking at monitors, but to me, they are right up there with image quality.

Lots of monitors have pretty good-looking images, but a lot of them are let down by poorly designed operating systems and monitoring assist tools that are not in any way accurate.

Like all modern SmallHD monitors, the Cine 5 uses the same PageBuilder OS graphical user interface (GUI). SmallHD built the PageBuilder OS to make menus less confusing. PageBuilder is a very customizable system as it allows you to selectively apply monitoring tools such as waveform, vectorscope, multiview, LUTs, and focusing aids on different "pages".

At least, in my opinion, the PageOS 5 operating system is far superior to any other operating system on the market, especially the ones that you will find in competing 5″ monitors. The customization and features that are available, put a lot of other operating systems to shame.

SmallHD's PageOS 5 which was released in September added quite a few new features and enhanced functionality. Below you can see what some of the key new additions are:

Since the initial release, there have already been two new firmware updates for PageOS 5. SmallHD's Page OS v5.2.0 firmware update adds a couple of nice new features.

One of the main reasons I personally like SmallHD monitors is that they continually update and add features and improvements to their monitors. With almost all of the cheaper monitors on the market, what you buy is what you get and it is very rare to see firmware updates or new features added.

This firmware is NOT compatible with SmallHD legacy monitors (DP1, DP6, DP4, AC7, and DP7-PRO. It is also NOT compatible with the DSMC3 RED Touch or Action 5 RED Touch.

SmallHD has also released Page OS v5.2.1, but this is a minor manufacturing update.

If you haven't used a SmallHD monitor with PageBuilder before, it doesn't take too long to get the hang of it. I love this system as it allows me to very quickly go between different scopes or monitoring assist tools, etc. I find this a much quicker system to use because you don't have to go into endless menus and turn items on and off like on most monitor interfaces.

Having the ability to assign just one, or many tools to a single page makes it very quick to access a monitoring assist tool or make a change. It also allows you to customize what you actually need instead of being forced to use what a manufacturer gives you.

You can also rename and customize the individual pages you create.

I especially like the Color Picker function where you can move a target icon around and it will display color values for you. On the Cine 5, you can set up to four different reference points which are extremely handy for making sure you get accurate exposure and colors.

By setting multiple color picker points on a color checker chart you can make sure that your colors and exposure are as accurate as possible.

As the color picker gives you representations for Y, Cb, Cr, and R, G, B you can clearly see exposure levels and RGB values. This way you can be sure that white is actually white and you can make adjustments so that midle grey exposure is accurate. As you can see above, my white is white, but my IRE for middle grey is too high, so I can use this to adjust my exposure down to the correct range.

You can also use the color picker in conjunction with false color for making sure middle grey exposure is accurate.

One of the other nice aspects of PageBuilder OS is that SmallHD has actually bothered to standardize the false-color functionality. As a default, the false colors are mapped directly to ARRI cameras, but you can also customize them to whatever camera you are using. This is a big deal. A lot of other monitors just have false color with no scale or markings and you have no idea what you are actually seeing. As the false color indicators on the SmallHD accurately reflect what I am seeing in my EVF I know I can rely on them.

Above you can see that the main false color values look exactly the same on my EVF, and on the Cine 5 and the Cine 7. This is exactly the consistency you want.

As I use a SmallHD Cine 7 as my on-camera monitor it is nice to be able to go to the smaller Cine5 or the larger Cine 13 and have the OS system be exactly the same.

SmallHD doesn't just release an operating system and then never change it. The PageOS system is constantly being updated and improved.

The monitor includes the following inputs and outputs:

The Cine 5 offers you a good array of inputs and outputs for a monitor of this size.

When I fed an HDMI signal into the Cine 5 and then tried to output a signal over SDI it worked perfectly. Conversely, If I input an SDI signal and then output an HDMI signal that also worked.

Having cross-conversion on a monitor is a big deal, especially if you are using it on camera with limited outputs.

You can power the Cine 5 via the two Sony NP-F battery plates on the back or through the LEMO 2-Pin (10-34V DC), 1.6A Input.

I like how SmallHD also included a 1 x LEMO 5-Pin 2.0 Output for powering accessories.

Again, usability has been well thought through. Having the ability to power accessories such as wireless RX units directly from the monitor is very handy.

SmallHD doesn't list how much power the Cine 5 draws.

SmallHD also gives you several power options in the main menu.

I don't think that the Cine 5 has an inbuilt fan, if it does it is incredibly quiet. The monitor does have two cooling vents on the back.

The monitor does get hot if you leave it on for long periods of time. It is currently reasonably cold here in Japan so I haven't been able to see how it performs in hotter environments yet. As I mentioned earlier, it doesn't get as hot as a Cine 7, because the Cine 7 doesn't have any cooling vents at all.

I don't like monitors or products that take too long to boot up before you can use them. The Cine 5 boots up reasonably quickly. I timed it at about 4-5 seconds from the time I turned it on till I got a picture up on the screen.

Getting critical focus is essential when using a monitor, especially if you are using fast lenses and shooting fairly wide open. One of the big benefits of having a display with such a high number of PPI is that it makes it a lot easier to check critical focus.

Even if you zoom in 4.00x on the image you can see very clearly if something is sharp or not. I recommend turning peaking on when doing this.

You can change the intensity, brightness, and contrast when peaking is enabled.

By utilizing peaking and image zoom you can make sure that you absolutely have focus nailed.

On the Cine 5 you can change the color, intensity, brightness, and contrast of the Focus Assist.

You can also select a B&W option that lets you clearly see what you are focusing on.

The Cine 5 doesn't come with a range of pre-configured LUTS already installed, but you can load up your own LUTs to use. This is a fairly easy process and you just need to load them up onto an SD card.

The SD card slot is located on the right-hand side of the monitor.

What I like is that you aren't just limited to being able to load up a handful of LUTs. You can load up and store as many as you like. I tested his out and loaded up 142 different LUTs with no problem at all.

What I like is when you select a LUT you get a small preview version of what it will look like on the right-hand side.

SmallHD gives you a lot of customization options when using scopes.

You can change their size, position, and opacity.

You can even make any one of the scopes full screen if you want to.

With the waveform, you can choose to display a spot location on your image, and that area is then highlighted on the waveform itself. This is an incredibly useful feature because looking at a waveform can sometimes be confusing. You can also change the size of the spot meter depending on what you want to look at.

SmallHD also lets you customize the size of your main image so you can then add scopes that aren't being overlayed over the top.

You can then customize the position and size of your scopes to suit your requirements.

You also have a lot of customization when it comes to using zebras. You can change the color as well as set minimum and maximum IRE levels. Setting IRE levels lets you use zebras for a range of different exposure levels. For example, above I have set the IRE levels to 38-41 which are the middle grey values on an ARRI.

I could also set them to 52-56 IRE which is basically one-stop above middle gray and what you would use for caucasian skin tones.

What I love is that you can also choose to ignore the Look (LUT) that you are using so it will show you the zebra levels based on your Log image. This is incredibly useful.

On the Cine 5 you can choose from a range of aspect ratios depending on your needs.

You can also set up markers for various formats and safe areas.

SmallHD gives you the ability to capture screen images which you can then save.

These are useful, especially when combined with the Image Overlay function so you can set up the exact framing from a previous shot.

The Cine 5 does have a stereo headphone jack that is located on the right-hand side of the monitor near the power on/off button and the SD card slot.

Most people are looing for daylight-viewable options when choosing an on-camera monitor. The Cine 5 utilizes a 2,000 nit, 1920 x 1080 LCD screen. The monitor also has an optically bonded anti-reflective screen. This optically-bonded Gorilla Glass has been used because of its transparency and toughness. The optical bonding process is supposed to reduce the harshness of reflections and make sure that blacks are not washed out.

2,000 nits are what I personally would consider as being daylight viewable on a smaller-sized monitor.

I found that in real-world use the screen was bright enough to be used outdoors, even in direct sunlight. It certainly helps that the screen isn't super reflective.

Just like higher resolution doesn't always equate to a better camera, higher nits don't always equate to a better monitor. I have seen countless 3,000 nit screens that look washed out and terrible.

Whether or not a 5″ display is big enough for use as an on-camera monitor really depends on what your intended use is. On smaller-sized digital cinema cameras, 5″ is a nice size, on larger cameras some people would prefer a larger 7″ size.

A lot of people are so used to viewing material on smartphones, so in a strange way 5″ doesn't actually feel as small as its size would suggest.

At the end of the day if a monitor can't display accurate images then it doesn't matter how many bells and whistles it has. If you are going to pay good money for a monitor then you want that monitor to display an excellent image.

Specialized TV & Film monitors are exceptionally expensive compared to consumer TV sets. You can buy an 85″ 4K HDR TV for around the same price as the Cine 5. You could also buy a fast 85mm stills lens for significantly less than a high-end cine prime. Everything is relative.

The image quality is excellent on the Cine 5. I haven't used every 5-7″ monitor on the market, but I have tested quite a few. Personally, I found the image quality on the Cine 5 to be amongst the best I have seen. In saying that, a lot of the screens these days can look fairly similar, and even some of the cheaper monitors are capable of displaying a nice-looking image. Unfortunately, with a lot of the cheaper options that are available the quality control leaves a lot to be desired and you can have two of the exact same monitors that have different-looking images.

Quite often I have found that most high-bright monitors are a compromise between brightness and image quality. I found this to be the case with the 3,000 nit 703 Bolt. The Cine 5 strikes an excellent balance between image quality and brightness.

The colors are nice and vivid and most importantly the blacks look nice and black. Even at 2,000 nits the Cine 5 retains good contrast and color rendition. Most importantly the colors I was seeing on the Cine 5 looked almost identical to those of my EVF. A lot of monitors tend to be overly saturated and at first glance, they look great, but a good-looking image doesn't mean that it is accurate.

The trouble with trying to evaluate any monitor's image quality is that it is very subjective. What one person may think looks good, another may think looks terrible. Personally, I want the monitor to match as closely to what I am seeing in my camera's EVF.

I have mentioned this in previous monitor reviews, and although it might sound like a ridiculous question to ask, does accuracy really matter? With a lot of people now watching content on different screens and types of screens, it's a legitimate question.

Just because you are basing color accuracy, brightness, and contrast off whatever monitoring or grading monitor you are using there is very little chance that it is going to be seen by someone as intended unless it happens to be shown in a movie theatre (and even then there is still variables).

In the case of giving a monitor to a director, producer, or client, does it really need to be super accurate? That answer is really going to depend on the level of production. Personally, I would rather try and provide the best image possible so that a director, producer, or client knows exactly what they are getting. I found that the image from the Cine 5 enabled me to view a very accurate indication of what I was seeing in my EVF.

Most monitors will look good indoors, but outdoor usability is what separates a great monitor from a good monitor. Too often I have tested so-called "Daylight viewable" monitors only to find out they can't be used outdoors.

So how does the Cine 5 perform outdoors in sunny conditions? As I previously mentioned, I had no problem using the Cine 5 outdoors, even in direct sunlight.

SmallHD does sell an optional Ultra Matte Screen Protector for Smart 5 Monitors, but there is no sunhood available.

To check the claimed brightness of the Cine 5, I shot a white card with a light set at 6000K, and then exposed the image so it was just below 100% so there was no clipping. I then took a reading from the Cine 5 using a Sekonic C-800. The Cine 5 was set in its D65 mode. The Cine 5 has a claimed maximum brightness of 2,000 nits so does it produce 2,000 nits?

There are a few different brightness modes on the Cine 5. The first one I tested was the Standard Range mode with the backlight set to 100.

The Cine 5 gave me a reading of 1,980 lux and a Kelvin color temperature reading of 5833K. Just for reference, it had a CC score of 0.1M. The reading of 1,980 lux was just 20 lux than SmallHD's figure of 2,000 lux.

Above you can see the results when I set the Cine 5 in its Studio Brightness mode and the backlight at 100. It recorded an output of 430 lux and a Kelvin color temperature reading of 5571K. Just for reference, it had a CC score of 0.0.

Just to be absolutely crystal clear these tests were just meant to measure the brightness. You shouldn't read too much into the Kelvin color temperature readings and CC scores.

I personally use a SmallHD Cine 7 as my on-camera monitor when one is required, so I wanted to see how well that matched with the Cine 5.

To my eye, the colors are very close between the two monitors. They are so well matched that it is hard to tell the difference. This isn't very evident from the still image I took, but In real life, it is hard to tell the difference.

Even though the Cine 7 has fewer nits than the Cine 5 it actually appears to be brighter because of its size.

To check the claimed brightness of the Cine 7 I measured it under the exact same conditions as I did with the Cine 5. I shot a white card with a light set at 6000K, and then exposed the image so it was just below 100% so there was no clipping. I then took a reading from the Cine 7 with a Sekonic C-800. The Cine 7 gave me a reading of 1,940 nits and a Kelvin color temperature reading of 5648K. It had a CC score of 0.1G.

In summary here is how the Cine 5 and Cine 7 compare when you look at brightness, Kelvin color temperature, and CC score under the exact same conditions.

On the SmallHD monitors, you can set the white point to various Kelvin color temperatures. For the above readings, the SmallHD monitors were set at D65 (6500K).

The great aspect about using SmallHD monitors is that all of the OS is exactly the same and all of the monitoring assist tools work in exactly the same way. This makes going from one monitor to another very intuitive and easy.

Above you can see an example where false color is being applied to the same image coming out of the camera to both the Cine 5 and the Cine 7. Both monitors are showing me the exact same thing, which is exactly what you want them to do.

The Cine 5 isn't an HDR-capable monitor. While the Cine 5 reaches 2,000 nits, it doesn't do so dynamically as to technically meet the HDR spec (for contrast ratio). However, it can still be used to monitor HDR.

According to SmallHD, their view is that on the monitoring side, relying on the picture alone, even a true HDR picture in anything other than a studio environment is not ideal and would result in improper exposure adjustments since the perceptions of what is on screen changes so drastically along with the viewing environment. For example, if monitoring on a bright sunny day, any subtleties in the darkest areas of an HDR picture will be completely lost to the eye and may not be accounted for – in this case, you actually would want a boosted black point so that issues can be spotted due to the environmental constraints.

In this methodology, reliance on exposure tools and scopes is even more important than before when speaking of HDR because, in a proper viewing environment, any issues at the extremes of a camera's dynamic range get magnified much further than with SDR.

When people ask how to best shoot for HDR, SmallHD normally recommends using a waveform set to RGB or parade (so if one individual color channel gets clipped you can pick it up before the luma waveform would see the same issue) or to set a custom exposure assist (false color) to the points in the image where clipping occurs. If shooting in log and at least 10-bit (12 bit+ preferred) and the extremes of the exposure range are managed, you’ll be capturing future-proof HDR-ready material. Now what to do with that footage next is a whole new issue with all the competing standards, and a surge of HDR10+ across manufacturers, etc. help demystify for the shooter while treading carefully not to further complicate this already complicated world.

SmallHD has employed some HDR previewing tools in their production monitors which apply the PQ curve to Log signals but they intend to make it even more user-friendly going forward.

HDR is far from any sort of fad, the benefits are tremendous when it comes to giving creative control back to the filmmakers

The SmallHD Cine 5 is certainly not cheap and it will set you back $1,599 USD. No matter which way you look at it, that is an awful lot of money for a 5″ display, especially since you can buy 5″ monitors for just a few hundred dollars.

Even though it is not what I would classify as affordable, you are getting a lot of functionality and features for your money, as well as very good build quality. However, it really comes down to what type of work you do and what your requirements are. It isn't a monitor that will be suitable for everyone, but I think professional users will see the benefits it offers over more affordable options.

Personally, I like to use the best possible monitoring tools I can afford. It is how I judge everything from exposure to color, to focus. I am not going to use a $150 monitor with an expensive camera.

What you also need to take into account is that the Cine 5 doesn't come with anything. You are still going to need batteries to power it (or a compatible powering cable), and a monitor arm, etc.

You can also purchase the Cine 5 directly from SmallHD.

There is a large array of 5-5.5″ monitors on the market that feature 3G-SDI inputs, but there are not that many that feature 3G-SDI loop through.

Here are just a few:

As I have said so many times before, it's not that hard to come up with a reasonably good-looking smaller-sized screen these days and be able to sell it for not a lot of money. The problem is there is a lot more to a monitor than just the display. It's the software, inputs, outputs, build quality, and the OS that separates the good and great monitors from the ok ones. The user experience with a monitor, at least in my opinion, is paramount.

The SmallHD Cine 5 ticks so many boxes when it comes to build quality, customization, inputs and outputs, OS, power options, and most importantly image quality.

The monitor certainly isn't cheap and $1,599 USD is an awful lot of money to spend on a 5″ display no matter which way you look at it. This monitor isn't a product that is being targeted at a wide audience, it is being targeted squarely at working professionals in the film & television industry.

I am a stickler for good monitoring and that is why I personally have no problem investing a lot of money in a good monitor or EVF. An accurate representation of what I am shooting is important to me. Buy once, cry once.

At the end of the day, a monitor or an EVF is how we judge everything we shoot. Why on earth would you not want to use the best possible option you can afford? Someone buying a Ferrari isn't going to put retreads on their car there and expect it to handle well. Do you really want to use the equivalent of retreads as your sole monitoring option?

The Cine 5 is very solidly made, it features the best OS on the market and the image quality is superb. Yes, it is expensive, but sometimes you do pay for what you get.

Matthew Allard is a multi-award-winning, ACS accredited freelance Director of Photography with over 30 years' of experience working in more than 50 countries around the world.He is the Editor of Newsshooter.com and has been writing on the site since 2010.Matthew has won 48 ACS Awards, including five prestigious Golden Tripods. In 2016 he won the Award for Best Cinematography at the 21st Asian Television Awards.Matthew is available to hire as a DP in Japan or for work anywhere else in the world.